untwistyerpanties said: Thank you for standing up against asexuality being a ranging thing. I am asexual and just about done with all this "It's a sexuality!!1" and "It's a spectrum1!!1!" when no, it is not. It is literally the lack of sexual attraction. There is no "sometimes" and if there is, that is perfectly sexual of you.
You’re welcome, but there’s only so much someone who’s not involved in the asexual community can do. Asexuals have really got to stand up for themselves if they want to stop being trivialized and erased.
"Explaining the pronunciation of non-binary pronouns."
Submitted by flavorbutt.
"Being upset that your sisters are afraid of being persecuted by their fellow women for calling all men rapists and monsters." x
You can’t make this shit up.
"Relentlessly bashing a 13-year-old for promoting tolerance." x
Because they’re never too young to get death threats.
in normal sentences.” x
This is perhaps the most personally offensive thing to me that SJWs do. They write shitty diatribes, hit Enter a few times throughout them, and have the unfettered gall to call it poetry. You’re as much of a poet as I’m a ballet dancer.
"Pointing out that copper is white people." x
wisp-queen said: Saying asexuality is a result of a "condition" is just ignorant. Orientations regard who you're attracted too, and we're not attracted to any gender. Simple. As for the spectrum, I think that has to do with the fact that gender and genitals are not the same, as any trans or nonbinary person can testify. We may not care for what's in someone's pants, but that doesn't mean we don't want to be loved. Gender and sexuality are 4-dimensional constructs, we don't all fit in your perfect boxes.
Saying asexuality is a condition is a fact. Orientations regard who you are sexually attracted to, and asexuals do not experience sexual attraction. Simple. As for the spectrum, it doesn’t exist, because regardless of your gender or genitals, asexuals do not experience sexual attraction. Love is not the same as sexual attraction and can be experienced without it; romance does not have to be sexual. “4-dimensional” refers to length, area, volume, and time, and it is the dimension we live in, and as a result, we can only see 3 dimensions.
Fixed that for you,
Wow. Whole load of utter bullshit.
You can’t tell GSRM people how to identify. And calling asexuality a /condition/ makes it seem as if something is wrong from them for not feeling sexual attraction. And that is fucking bullshit.
You’re right, I can’t tell GSM people how to identify. I can, however, inform them that they are wrong for identifying a certain way and are redefining that identity at the expense of the people who actually belong to it.
The connotations you place on the word ‘condition’ do not make it any less accurate. There is nothing wrong with being asexual but it is not a sexuality and there are no gray areas in it.
spoopy-ukej said: If someone unfollows you for *gasp* expressing your opinion then did you really want them following you?
If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around, does it make a sound?
arobotunicorn said: I lost TWO followers in an hour because of you, right after I got to 100. And all I can say is, thank you SO FUCKING MUCH for that.
It was necessary. You purged the unclean. Be proud!